A retrospective, multicenter study on a novo wide-body implant for posterior regions.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Wide implants are recommended as "rescues" after failure to increase primary stability in extraction sockets or in poor quality bone. Consequently, inferior results compared with regular diameter implants have been reported. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the outcome of a novo wide-body implant (Max® implant, Southern Implants®, Irene, South Africa) designed for placement in the posterior regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS In four private practices, patients with at least one Max implant were examined by two independent examiners to determine implant survival and marginal bone loss. Surgical, prosthetic, and patient-related parameters were evaluated to determine their influence on the treatment outcome. RESULTS Seventy-five patients (31 male, 44 female), with a mean age of 58 years, received 93 Max implants (59 maxilla, 34 mandible) of 8 to 10 mm width. Twenty-seven implants in molar extraction sockets and two in mature bone were immediately loaded; 42 in extraction sockets and 22 in mature bone were delayed loaded. The mean follow-up was 14 months (6-34), and four implants failed (4.3%); mean bone loss after 1 year was 0.46 mm (SD 1.08; range -5.45-3.25). A total of 91.4% lost <1.5 mm of bone during the first year. The implant survival rate was 89.7% and 98.4%, respectively, for the immediate and delayed loaded implants and 95.8% and 95.7% for delayed and immediate placement. Time of placement, time of loading, surgical protocol, or prosthetic design did not affect the outcome. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of the study, the Max implant demonstrated a survival rate of 95.7% and stable bone conditions after a year, irrespective of loading or surgical protocol. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the soft and hard tissue changes in time.
منابع مشابه
بررسی میزان بزرگنمایی عمودی رادیوگرافی پانورامیک در مقایسه با CBCT به تفکیک محل آناتومیک
Background: Currently, dental implant is one of the most modern approaches to teeth replacement. Panoramic radiography is considered as the prerequisite for implant therapy. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the vertical magnification of digital panoramic images in various anatomic parts of the mandible. Method: A total of 30 patients referred to Sajjad Radiography Center for...
متن کاملبررسی بزرگنمایی عمودی رادیوگرافی پانورامیک توسط مقاطع CT اسکن تهیه شده برای ایمپلنت
Background and Aims: The Panoramic radiography is one of the routine techniques in implant imaging. Although there are some limitations with this technique, panoramic radiography is radiographic choice for basic evaluation for implant treatment. Many studies have been designed to determine magnification in panoramic images but most of them were performed on dry skulls or radiographic phantoms. ...
متن کاملThe clinical effectiveness of screw type Implant “Nisastan system” in the posterior region of the mandible: A 2 year prospective study
The clinical effectiveness of screw type Implant “Nisastan system” in the posterior region of the mandible: A 2 year prospective study Dr. M. Rismanchian * - Dr. R. Birang ** * Assistant Professor of Fixed Prosthodontics Dept., Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. ** Assistant Professor of Periodontics Dept., Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences....
متن کاملتعیین توزیع تنش و کرنش استخوان اطراف ایمپلنت در طرح All-on-4 به روش آنالیز اجزای محدود
Background and Aims: The All-on-4 design with its significant advantages is an appropriate model in reconstruction of edentulous mandible. Evaluation of stress and strain distribution in this model is necessary for better judgment. The purpose of this FEA study was to measure stress and strain distribution on peri-implant bone in All-on-4 design in edentulous mandible. Materials and Methods: Th...
متن کاملبررسی عوارض جراحی پولیواسکولیوز
This is a retrospective study of 83 patients with polioscoliosis, treated surgically in Shafa hospital (1970-1997), and the results are as Follow: implant failure: 15 cases (18%), pseudoar throsis: 12 cases (14.5%) deep infection: 4 cases (4.5%) superficial infection: 3 cases (3.6%) cast sore: 17 cases (20.5%) and loss of correction: 28 cases (33.7%). Implant failure was more common in Harr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical implant dentistry and related research
دوره 14 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012